• Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
  • Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
TNI D&D
  • Home
  • About us
    • About us
    • People
    • Partners
    • Researchers
    • Contact us
    • In the media
    • Newsletter
  • Newsroom
    • Press contacts
    • Press releases
    • Resources
    • Drugs in the news
  • Issues
    • Drug policy debate in the Americas
    • Decriminalization
    • Proportionality of sentences
    • Harm reduction
    • Reclassification of substances
    • Safer crack use
    • Human rights
    • Regulation
    • Unscheduling the coca leaf
    • Ending the war on drugs
    • Alternative development
    • Cannabis
    • Producers of Crops
    • Law enforcement
    • ATS, Mild stimulants & NPS
    • European Drug Policy
    • Money Laundering
  • UN Drug
    Control
    • Conventions
    • UNODC
    • CND
    • INCB
    • UNGASS
  • Country
    information
    • Drug Law Reform on the Map
    • Central America
      • El Salvador
      • Guatemala
      • Honduras
      • Costa Rica
    • Latin America
      • Argentina
      • Bolivia
      • Paraguay
      • Brazil
      • Chile
      • Colombia
      • Ecuador
      • Peru
      • Uruguay
      • Venezuela
    • Mexico
    • Caribbean
      • Jamaica
      • Belize
    • Afghanistan
  • Events
    • Expert Seminars
    • Informal Policy Dialogues
    • Public Events
    • Judges for Law Reform
  • Publications
    • Drug Policy Briefings
    • Drug Law Reform
    • Legislative Reform Series
    • The Human Face
    • Drugs & conflict
    • Drugs and the Law (CEDD)
      • Systems overload
    • Drug Markets and Violence
  • Weblog

 

UNGASS ten years on

Background memo for the UNGASS 10-year review

Weaknesses in the United Nations drug control system have often been identified, related to the functioning of the key organs – the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), International Narcotics Control Board (INCB), and the Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND) –, related to collaboration with the wider UN system – the World Health Organistaion (WHO), UNAIDS, UN Development Programme (UNDP), etc. – and related to the outdated character of several treaty provisions.

  • What has been attempted to date to achieve more structural reform?
  • Are existing evaluation mechanisms capable of bringing the need for reform to the table?

Tensions have arisen about the way the INCB performs its duties and about its legal interpretation of the conventions. INCB reports and letters have condemned policy practices that the concerned countries consider to be defendable. The conventions describe the Board’s mission explicitly in terms of co-operation and dialogue.

  • Is the INCB overstepping its mandate?
  • How could a neutral and evidence-based role of UNODC as a centre of expertise be strengthened?
  • How can these issues be related to the UN call for more ‘system-wide coherence’ and ‘delivery as one’?

Background

The international drug control system has been in continuous evolution since 1961. While the Single Convention focused on the cultivation of plants with narcotic properties, the 1971 Convention was created by the wish of the pharmaceutical companies to keep psychotropic drugs separate. The 1988 Convention introduced the crime of drug money laundering but also obliged member states to criminalise a wide range of drug-related activities.

In 1993, with all three conventions in place and with the expiry of the transitional period of 25 years established under the 1961 convention, a three-day high level meeting was held during the General Assembly. The tone was set by a letter from Mexico, which pointed out that that illicit cultivation was continuing, drug consumption had increased and criminal organisations were expanding. It made reference to a variety of issues such as precursors, money laundering and alternative development, and mentioned the need to review drug classification with reference to WHO, alluding to the possibility of cannabis being taken out of the conventions altogether. It also requested that more attention be given to the demand for drugs.

This marked the beginning of the move towards a ‘more balanced’ approach. The early 1990s was a period of increasing polarisation across the world. It was clear that the aims of the conventions had not been met and that the market was growing rather than shrinking. Tougher sanctions were imposed through a wave of repressive legislation. The message was, “the 1988 convention has teeth but now we have to make it bite”. At the same time many European countries were starting a harm reduction approach, and were applying more leniency with regard to cannabis. In the same period WHO had two research programmes running on coca issues and cannabis. The findings of these research projects were viewed with outrage by many governments.

INCB’s annual report for 1994 highlighted a number of outdated provisions and contradictions within the conventions. An advisory committee was set up to look at how the drug control system could be improved. It recommended that the status of coca and cannabis be re-examined, and suggested looking more closely at harm reduction and decriminalisation policies. However CND decided not to implement any of the recommendations of the advisory group and INCB’s list of recommendations to resolve the contradictions in the conventions was never acted on.

In the end the ‘reconsider’ lobby was neutralised. Some of Mexico’s concerns were eventually addressed at the 1998 UNGASS, when the principle of alternative development was accepted for the first time, and when a precursors action plan and the Guiding Principles on demand reduction were introduced.

With the 2008 UNGASS evaluation the dilemma is with us again : to reconsider or reaffirm. There has clearly been a stabilisation of the market, although ‘containment’ may not be the appropriate description. Harm reduction has become more widespread, largely due to HIV/AIDS, but prison populations have increased. Inside the broader UN system there has been a debate on UN reform and system wide coherence. With regard to drugs, inconsistencies have worsened. Several problems need to be addressed:

1. Harm reduction. Part of the UN (the larger part) uses the language and practice of harm reduction as a matter of course, whereas under pressure from the US, UNODC, INCB and CND do not.

2. UN coherence and responsibilities. There is more tension now between INCB and WHO over scheduling issues (eg over Khat, dronabinol/delta-9-THC) where WHO has the primary responsibility.

3. The tensions between the drug control treaties and practices and other UN treaties, principles and practices – for example human rights violations in the context of drug law enforcement. The UN drug agencies do nothing to prevent these.

4. The transparency of the UN drug control process and the associated NGO community. All UN agencies have established procedures for NGO participation and transparency of procedures, including the availability of documents, while the drug agencies still have a poor record in this regard.

Problem contained ?

The UNODCs Executive Director’s report on the UNGASS evaluation will almost certainly state that the drug consumption problem has been contained. It will be argued that most goals have been achieved, that there have been great advances in money laundering, in precursor legislation and in treatment availability. The truth is that
consumption has grown in countries where before it was insignificant. Containment is not a satisfactory answer, and patterns of consumption are very complex.

Colombian government officials acknowledge privately that current drug policies do not work, and at the 2008 CND Colombia may say that eradication is not a valid policy. Many Colombians think cocaine should be legalised. An alternative solution must be found, which should include a debate about causality and about why both coca and opium are concentrated in very few countries. If this is not done the errors of the past will be repeated.

Some 15 years ago the big Colombian cartels were destroyed. The new cartels were fragmented and they subcontracted out their armed services. Left and right wing paramilitary groups became involved. From being run by mafia-type drug lords, now the organisations are run by warlords who use funds to reinforce territorial control. This is not containment. Solving the problem has become much more difficult.

Data problems

The evaluation will try to focus on results, but UNODC’s data are very contradictory, and it can only use data provided by governments. If one takes the figures at face value Colombia has eradicated more coca cultivation than estimates of cultivation pre-eradication, so there should be none left. In Colombia every sprayed crop is
counted as eradicated, and this system leads to errors of double counting. The basis for the ‘containment’ conclusion is based on BRQ answers, but these cannot be trusted. UNODC does not have the capability to ensure that BRQs are properly completed, and has no means of knowing the basis on which answers are made. Responding countries do not use the same methodologies and there are wide inconsistencies. The mandate for the World Drug Report states that it should be ‘authoritative, objective and scientific’, but UNODC does not have enough staff to do serious statistical analysis.

The Expert Working Group seems to have concluded that the BRQ is not a good instrument and does not give a basis for impact assessment. On the positive side, it has caused a focus on demand reduction in countries where this did not exist before. One should be cautious in disparaging the BRQ because many countries will use this
as an excuse to do nothing.

UNODC, crime and terrorism

There is a tendency within UNODC to focus more on terrorism and to move drug issues into this field. If the shift continues UNODC will have a completely new dynamic: the name and organisational focus will shift towards terrorism, crime and drug control, because this is where the money is. While drug control should not be seen through primarily through a crime prism, the Crime Commission is strongly rooted in human rights issues, and this approach could be useful. The five-yearly crime congress could even be a model for meetings with a wider range of participants.

In the UK drugs is called a ‘cross cutter’ because it affects all parts of society and is seen through the different perspectives of young people, health and crime. A powerful coordination mechanism exists to resolve tensions between them. The problem is that in the UN system there is no such mechanism for drug control, but this could be a recommendation for 2008-9. Alternatively, rather than create a new inter-agency coordination body, UNODC could be asked to integrate WHO and UNAIDS expertise into its work and into CND meetings to a greater extent.

It is recommended that:

• The functioning and mandate of INCB be examined, and the boundaries of its mandate established;
• The mandate of WHO, which was largely taken away in the early 1990s, should be re-established and its authority at CND meetings reaffirmed.
• The capacity of UNODC to undertake statistical analysis should be strengthened.
• A study should be made of the relationship between UN drug control and other UN treaties, and of certain legal aspects of the conventions. The aim should be to bring more rationality and evidence into the debate.

  • Labels
    10-year Review | civil society | WHO | conventions | CND | UNODC | UNGASS | INCB | UN drug control

Drugs in the News

  • Blow to red light tourists: cannabis smoking banned in public
    25.05.2023
  • ‘It will create a police state’: Dagga Party calls cannabis bill ‘fascist’
    23.05.2023
  • You can’t legalise cannabis for private use and criminalise selling it, says farming group
    20.05.2023
  • European cannabis legalisation moves into the slow-dopey lane
    11.05.2023
  • Gang violence could end open cannabis trade in anarchist commune Christiania
    09.05.2023
  • Thailand’s cannabis sellers say US growers are eating their lunch
    08.05.2023
More news

Weblog

    Willful blindness: INCB can find nothing good to say on cannabis legalisationWillful blindness: INCB can find nothing good to say on cannabis legalisation
    14.03.2023
More weblog

Hilites

Balancing Treaty Stability and Change

balancing hilite

Inter se modification of the UN drug control conventions to facilitate cannabis regulation


Connecting the dots...

connecting dots hilite

Human rights, illicit cultivation and alternative development


Morocco and Cannabis

morocco cannabis hilite

Reduction, containment or acceptance


The Rise and Decline of Cannabis Prohibition

rise decline hilite

The History of Cannabis in the UN Drug Control System and Options For Reform


Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  36 afghanistan  25 show all

Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  36 afghanistan  25 hide
africa  13 albania  14 alternative development  120 alternatives to policing  2 amnesty  88 amsterdam  29 appellation of origin  3 argentina  32 asean  9 ATS  15 australia  105 austria  5 ayahuasca  6 bahamas  4 ballot 2012  155 banking  48 barbados  11 belgium  43 belize  10 bermuda  15 bhang  14 bolivia  118 brazil  94 brownfield doctrine  24 burma  45 california  214 cambodia  12 canada  533 cannabinoids  104 cannabis  3177 cannabis clubs  216 cannabis industry  406 caribbean  148 caricom  33 cbd oil  1 central america  5 chile  21 china  46 civil society  37 CND  130 coca  218 cocaine  87 coffee shop  227 cognitive decline  30 colombia  158 colorado  163 compulsary detention  19 conflict  4 conventions  275 corporate capture  57 corruption  4 costa rica  10 crack  54 craft cannabis  30 crime  86 czech republic  46 dark net  4 death penalty  3 decertification  1 decriminalization  916 deforestation  10 denmark  125 drug checking  41 drug consumption rooms  193 drug courts  22 drug markets  144 drug policy index  2 drug testing  7 drug trade  59 e-cigarettes  1 e-joint  2 ecstasy  68 ecuador  22 egypt  16 el salvador  2 environment  35 eradication  129 essential medicines  25 estonia  1 eswatini  7 ethiopia  3 european drug policy  107 expert advisory group  9 extrajudicial killings  95 fair trade  16 fentanyl  80 france  115 fumigation  27 gateway theory  29 georgia  3 germany  203 ghana  18 global commission  46 greece  19 guatemala  31 guatemala initiative  47 harm reduction  341 hemp  42 heroin  139 heroin assisted treatment  80 HIV/AIDS  61 home cultivation  112 honduras  3 human rights  258 ICC  1 illinois  10 incarceration  53 INCB  142 india  97 indigenous rights  1 indonesia  35 informal drug policy dialogues  22 inter se modification  17 iran  14 ireland  15 israel  63 italy  42 jamaica  173 japan  3 kava  4 kazakhstan  5 kenya  11 ketamine  27 khat  37 kratom  32 kyrgyzstan  1 laos  2 latin american debate  115 law enforcement  418 lebanon  43 legal highs  64 legalization  1660 lesotho  10 local customization  11 luxembourg  51 malawi  4 malaysia  7 malta  49 medical cannabis  654 mental health  44 methamphetamine  48 mexico  210 Mid-Term Review  1 mild stimulants  46 money laundering  54 morocco  126 naloxone  16 nepal  7 netherlands  331 new york  33 new zealand  67 NIDA  5 nitrous oxide  7 norway  18 NPS  10 opinion polls  131 opioids  150 opium  94 oregon  29 overdose kits  4 pakistan  9 panama  5 paraguay  4 pardon  2 patents  18 peace  24 peru  45 peyote  3 philippines  89 pilot project  127 pleasure  5 poland  2 police pacification  18 portugal  68 potency  2 precursors  7 prevention  3 prison situation  101 prohibition  152 proportionality  110 psychedelics  13 psychosis  55 puerto rico  3 racism  29 reclassification  119 recriminalisation  36 regulation  1403 russia  36 sacramental use  11 safe supply  32 safer crack  29 scheduling  27 scientific research  144 sdg  2 security  14 senegal  1 sentencing  67 singapore  7 social justice  79 somalia  7 south africa  83 spain  79 st lucia  9 st vincent and grenadines  31 substance-use disorder  20 substitution treatment  31 sweden  30 switzerland  150 synthetic cannabinoids  30 taxation  54 teen use  43 thailand  72 thresholds  60 tobacco industry  17 traditional growers  158 tramadol  17 treatment  28 trinidad & tobago  15 tunisia  14 UK  280 UN Common Position  1 UN drug control  444 UNGASS  58 UNODC  110 uruguay  146 US drug policy  1185 vaping  2 venezuela  5 vietnam  5 violence  134 WHO  66 world drug report  11 yemen  6

This website

UN Drug Control

In 2011 the 1961 UN Single Convention on drugs will be in place for 50 years. In 2012 the international drug control system will exist 100 years since the International Opium Convention was signed in 1912 in The Hague. Does it still serve its purpose or is a reform of the UN Drug Conventions needed? This site provides critical background.

Drug Law Reform on the map

dlronthemap_und

Copyright © 2016 Drug Law Reform in Latin America

Website by WebWolf